Connect with us
...

Finance

6 health insurance terms you need to know

Published

on

It’s open enrollment season, the time each year when millions of American workers and retirees must choose a health plan, whether new or existing.

But picking health insurance can be a dizzying venture. Health plans have many moving parts — which may not come into focus at first glance. And each has financial implications for buyers.

“It is confusing, and people have no idea how much they could potentially have to pay,” said Carolyn McClanahan, a certified financial planner and founder of Life Planning Partners, based in Jacksonville, Florida. She is also a medical doctor.

Making a mistake can be costly; consumers are generally locked into their health insurance for a year, with limited exception.

Here’s a guide to the major cost components of health insurance and how they may impact your bill.

1. Premiums

The premium is the sum you pay an insurer each month to participate in the health plan.

It’s perhaps the most transparent and easy-to-understand cost component of a health plan — the equivalent of a sticker price.

The average premium for an individual is $7,911 a year — or $659 a month — in 2022, according to a report on employer coverage from the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit. It’s $22,463 a year — $1,872 a month — for family coverage.

However, employers often pay a share of these premiums for their workers, greatly reducing the cost. The average worker pays a total $1,327 per year — or, $111 a month — for individual coverage and $6,106 — $509 a month — for family coverage in 2022, after factoring in employers’ share.

Your monthly payment may be higher or lower depending on the type of plan you choose, the size of your employer, your geography and other factors, according to KFF.

Medicare inflation threatens retirement security

Low premiums don’t necessarily translate to good value. You may be on the hook for a big bill later if you see a doctor or pay for a procedure, depending on the plan.

“When you’re shopping for health insurance, people naturally shop like they do for most products — by the price,” said Karen Pollitz, co-director of KFF’s program on patient and consumer protections.

“If you’re shopping for tennis shoes or rice, you know what you’re getting” for the price, she said. “But people really should not just price shop, because health insurance is not a commodity.

“The plans can be quite different” from each other, she added.

2. Co-pay

Many workers also owe a copayment — a flat-dollar fee — when they visit a doctor. A “co-pay” is a form of cost-sharing with health insurers.

The average patient pays $27 for each visit to a primary-care doctor and $44 to visit a specialty care physician, according to KFF.

3. Co-insurance

Patients may owe additional cost-sharing like co-insurance, a percentage of health costs that the consumer shares with the insurer. This generally kicks in after you’ve paid your annual deductible (a concept explained more fully below).

The average co-insurance rate is 19% for primary-care and 20% for specialty-care services, according to KFF data. The insurer would pay the other 81% and 80%, respectively.

As an example: If a specialty service costs $1,000, the average patient would pay 20% — or $200 — and the insurer would pay the remainder.

Co-pays and co-insurance may vary by service, with separate classifications for office visits, hospitalizations or prescription drugs, according to KFF. Rates and coverage may also differ for in-network and out-of-network providers.

4. Deductible

Fatcamera | E+ | Getty Images

Deductibles are another common form of cost-sharing.

This is the annual sum a consumer must pay out of pocket before the health insurer starts to pay for services.

Eighty-eight percent of workers covered by a health plan have a deductible in 2022, according to KFF. The average person with single coverage has a $1,763 deductible.

The deductible meshes with other forms of cost-sharing.

Here’s an example based on a $1,000 hospital charge. A patient with a $500 deductible pays the first $500 out of pocket. This patient also has 20% co-insurance, amounting to $100 (or, 20% of the remaining $500 tab). This person would pay a total $600 out of pocket for this hospital visit.

When you’re shopping for health insurance, people naturally shop like they do for most products — by the price.
Karen Pollitz
CO-DIRECTOR OF THE PROGRAM ON PATIENT AND CONSUMER PROTECTIONS AT THE KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION

Health plans may have more than one deductible — perhaps one for general medical care and another for pharmacy benefits, for example, Pollitz said.

Family plans may also assess deductibles in two ways: by combining the aggregate annual out-of-pocket costs of all family members, and/or by subjecting each family member to a separate annual deductible before the plan covers costs for that member.

The average deductible can vary widely by plan type: $1,322 in a preferred provider organization (PPO) plan; $1,451 in a health maintenance organization (HMO) plan; $1,907 in a point of service (POS) plan; and $2,539 in a high-deductible health plan, according to KFF data on single coverage. (Details of plan types are in more detail below.)

5. Out-of-pocket maximum

Most people also have an “out-of-pocket maximum.”

This is a limit on the total cost sharing consumers pay during the year — including co-pays, co-insurance and deductibles.

“The insurer can’t ask you for a co-pay at the doctor or pharmacy, or hit you for more deductibles,” Pollitz said. “That’s it; you’ve given your pound of flesh.”

More than 99% of workers with single coverage are in a plan with an out-of-pocket maximum, according to KFF.

And the range can be large: 8% of workers with single coverage have an out-of-pocket maximum of less than $2,000, but 26% have one of $6,000 or more, according to KFF data.

Out-of-pocket maximums for health plans purchased through an Affordable Care Act marketplace can’t exceed $9,100 for individuals or $18,200 for a family in 2023.

6. Network

Portra | E+ | Getty Images

Health insurers treat services and costs differently based on their “network.”

“In-network” refers to doctors and other health providers that are part of an insurer’s preferred network. Insurers sign contracts and negotiate prices with these in-network providers. This isn’t the case for “out-of-network” providers.

Here’s why that matters: Deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums are much higher when consumers seek care outside their insurer’s network — generally amounting to about double the in-network amount, McClanahan said.

There’s sometimes no cap at all on annual costs for out-of-network care.

“Health insurance really is all about the network,” Pollitz said.

“Your financial liability for going out of network can be really quite dramatic,” she added. “It can expose you to some serious medical bills.”

Some categories of plans disallow coverage for out-of-network services, with limited exception.

For example, HMO plans are among the cheapest types of insurance, according to Aetna. Among the tradeoffs: The plans require consumers to pick in-network doctors and require referrals from a primary care physician before seeing a specialist.

Similarly, EPO plans also require in-network services for insurance coverage, but generally come with more choice than HMOs.

POS plans require referrals for a specialist visit but allow for some out-of-network coverage. PPO plans generally carry higher premiums but have more flexibility, allowing for out-of-network and specialist visits without a referral.

“Cheaper plans have skinnier networks,” McClanahan said. “If you don’t like the doctors, you may not get a good choice and have to go out of network.”

There’s crossover between high-deductible health plans and other plan types; the former generally carry deductibles of more than $1,000 and $2,000, respectively, for single and family coverage and are paired with a health savings account, a tax-advantaged way for consumers to save for future medical costs.

How to bundle it all together

Mstudioimages | E+ | Getty Images

Budget is among the most important considerations, said Winnie Sun, co-founder and managing director of Sun Group Wealth Partners in Irvine, California, and a member of CNBC’s Advisor Council.

For example, would you struggle to pay a $1,000 medical bill if you require health care? If so, a health plan with a larger monthly premium and a smaller deductible may be your best bet, Sun said.

Similarly, older Americans or those who require a lot of health care each year — or who expect to have a costly procedure in the coming year — may do well to pick a plan with a bigger monthly premium but lower cost-sharing requirements.

Healthy people who generally don’t max out their health spending every year may find it cheaper overall to have a high-deductible plan with a health savings account, McClanahan said.

Consumers who enroll in a high-deductible plan should use their monthly savings on premiums to fund an HSA, advisors said.

Cheaper plans have skinnier networks. If you don’t like the doctors, you may not get a good choice and have to go out of network.
Carolyn McClanahan
CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER AND FOUNDER OF LIFE PLANNING PARTNERS

“Understand the first dollars and the potential last dollars when picking your insurance,” McClanahan said, referring to upfront premiums and back-end cost-sharing.

Every health plan has a “summary of benefits and coverage,” which presents key cost-sharing information and plan details uniformly across all health insurance, Pollitz said.

“I’d urge people to spend a little time with the SBC,” she said. “Don’t wait until an hour before the deadline to take a look. The stakes are high.”

Further, if you’re currently using a doctor or network of providers you like, ensure those providers are covered under your new insurance plan if you intend to switch, McClanahan said. You can consult an insurer’s in-network online directory or call your doctor or provider to ask if they accept your new insurance.

The same rationale goes for prescription drugs, Sun said: Would the cost of your current prescriptions change under a new health plan?

Reports /TrainViral/

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto

Bitcoin’s Recovery – the Downturn Is Over

Published

on

By

The market is currently in a news-driven environment where the prices of cryptocurrencies have been determined by news agenda rather than fundamentals.

Bitfinex analysts have warned crypto investors to be cautious as bitcoin’s (BTC) recovery over the weekend is not a sign that its correction is over; the asset could witness more bloodshed in the near term.

In the latest Bitfinex Alpha report, experts deemed the market’s reaction this week critical, especially as supply alleviated over the weekend could return when traditional markets open.

“No Man’s Land”

Since Saturday, bitcoin has risen almost 10% from $57,600 to $63,000, closing last week in the green. The asset has surged above the 125-day range low of $60,200, which it broke through earlier this month after news of the German government’s massive BTC selling hit the market.

Market sentiment began to improve after reports that wallets linked to the German government were almost empty. However, the positive sentiment may not be sustained for long as the BTC the German authorities moved to trading desks and exchanges are yet to be sold.

While the supply from Germany appears to have been factored into bitcoin’s market price, Bitfinex analysts believe the end of selling pressure depends on how the involved trading desks execute their trades in the coming days.

Although the shift in sentiment underscores the market’s capacity to integrate new information and adjust expectations quickly, analysts think the market’s reaction over the first two trading days of the week cannot be overlooked for two reasons.

First, the low support level in the $60,200 range has now become a potential resistance line. Second, trading patterns over the past three months suggest that weekends are usually favorable for markets, especially on Saturdays when supply pressure seems to subside.

“We are now in no man’s land until we get clear resolution above or below this level,” the analysts said.

A News-Driven Environment

Besides the potential resistance level and three-month weekend trading pattern, the market is currently in a news-driven environment, where the prices of cryptocurrencies have been determined by news agendas rather than fundamentals.

Since selling pressure concerns are not yet completely obsolete due to upcoming Mt Gox creditor distributions, Bitfinex analysts expect such headlines to continue to have some impact on price movements. As such, the analysts urged investors to exercise caution in their trading strategies.

Reports /Trainviral/

Continue Reading

Crypto

Bitcoin ETFs Saw $300M in Daily Net Inflows

Published

on

By

BlackRock’s IBIT led with $117.25 million in inflows on July 15, also being the most traded Bitcoin ETF.

The US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a daily net inflow of $301 million on July 15th. This extended their winning streak to seven consecutive days amidst a broader market recovery.

None of the ETFs recorded outflows for the day.

Bitcoin ETFs Rake in $16.11B in Net Inflows Since Jan

According to the data compiled by SoSoValue, BlackRock’s IBIT, the top spot Bitcoin ETF by net asset value, recorded the largest net inflows of the day at $117.25 million. IBIT was also the most actively traded Bitcoin ETF on Monday, with a volume of $1.24 billion. Ark Invest and 21Shares’ ARKB came in close behind with net inflows of $117.19 million.

Fidelity’s FBTC experienced net inflows of $36.15 million on Monday, while Bitwise’s BITB saw $15.24 million in inflows. VanEck’s HODL, Invesco and Galaxy Digital’s BTCO, and Franklin Templeton’s EZBC funds also recorded net inflows. Meanwhile, Grayscale’s GBTC and other ETFs, such as Valkyrie’s BRRR, WisdomTree’s BTCW, and Hashdex’s DEFI, registered no flows for the day.

A total of $2.26 billion was traded on Monday. The trading volume for these ETFs was less than in March when it exceeded $8 billion on some days. Meanwhile, these funds have collectively attracted $16.11 billion in net inflow since their January launch.

What’s Next For Bitcoin?

Earlier this month, bitcoin’s price decline was mainly due to fears of massive selling pressure from Mt. Gox and the German government’s BTC sales.

But the assassination attempt on pro-crypto former US President and presumptive Republican candidate Donald Trump at Saturday’s rally seemed to spark a recovery in the world’s largest digital asset, and experts are bullish on the asset’s price trajectory going forward. Bitcoin surged more than 9% over the past week and was currently trading slightly below $64,000.

Veteran trader Peter Brandt discussed bitcoin’s price outlook, suggesting a potential major rally. He referred to a pattern he terms “Hump->Slump->Bump->Dump->Pump” and highlighted that the July 5 double top attempt was a bear trap, confirmed by the July 13 close. He sees a likely continued upward trend but warned that a close below $56,000 would negate this bullish view.

“Bitcoin $BTC could be unfolding its often-repeated Hump…Slump…Bump…Dump…Pump chart construction. Jul 5 attempt at the double top was a bear trap, confirmed by Jul 13 close. Most likely scenario now is that bears are trapped. Close below $56k negates this interpretation”

Reports /Trainviral/

Continue Reading

Crypto

LI.FI DeFi Platform Exploited, Over $8M Lost

Published

on

By

PeckShield alert reveals LI.FI’s protocol vulnerability is similar to a March 2022 attack, with the same bug recurring.

The decentralized finance (DeFi) platform LI.FI protocol has suffered an exploit amounting to over $8 million.

Cyvers Alerts reported detecting suspicious transactions within the LI.FI cross-chain transaction aggregator.

LI.FI Issues Warning After $8 Million Exploit

LI.FI confirmed the breach in a statement on July 16 via X: “Please do not interact with any http://LI.FI powered applications for now! We’re investigating a potential exploit.” The team clarified that users who did not set infinite approval are not at risk, emphasizing that only those who manually set infinite approvals seem to be affected.

According to Cyvers Alerts, more than $8 million in user funds have been stolen, with the majority being stablecoins. According to on-chain data, the hacker’s wallet holds 1,715 Ether (ETH) valued at $5.8 million and USDC, USDT, and DAI stablecoins.

Cyvers Alerts advised users to revoke relevant authorizations immediately, noting that the attacker is actively converting USDC and USDT into ETH.

Crypto security firm Decurity provided insights into the exploit, stating that it involves the LI.FI bridge. “The root cause is a possibility of an arbitrary call with user-controlled data via depositToGasZipERC20() in GasZipFacet, which was deployed 5 days ago,” Decurity explained on X.

“In general, the risks behind routers, cross-chain swaps, etc. are about token approvals. Raw native assets like (unwrapped) ETH are safe from these kinds of hacks b/c they don’t have approvals as an option. Most users & wallets also no longer do “infinite approvals” which gives a smart contract total control on removing any amount of their tokens. It’s important to understand which tokens you’re approving to which contracts.

This dashboard looks for all transactions of a user that intersects Lifi. Not all of these transactions indicate risk- but you can see how, broadly, integrations & layers of tech (like how Metamask bridge uses Lifi on BSC) can complicate how users do or don’t put their assets at risk. Revoke Cash is the most well known approval manager app.

But it’s also good security practice to simply rotate your address. New addresses start with 0 approvals, so starting fresh by moving your tokens to a fresh address is another good security practice.” – commented Carlos Mercado, Data Scientist at Flipside Crypto.

Recent Exploit Mirrors March 2022 Attack

Further analysis by PeckShield alert revealed that the vulnerability is similar to a previous attack on LI.FI’s protocol that occurred on March 20, 2022. That incident saw a bad actor exploit LI.FI’s smart contract, specifically the swapping feature, before bridging.

The attacker manipulated the system to call token contracts directly within their contract’s context, making users who had given infinite approval vulnerable. This exploit resulted in the theft of approximately 205 ETH from 29 wallets, affecting tokens such as USDC, MATIC, RPL, GNO, USDT, MVI, AUDIO, AAVE, JRT, and DAI.

“The bug is basically the same. Are we learning anything from the past lesson(s)?” PeckShield Alert said in a July 16 X post.

Following the 2022 incident, LI.FI disabled all swap methods in its smart contract and worked on developing a fix to prevent future vulnerabilities. However, the recurrence of a similar exploit raises concerns about the platform’s security measures and whether adequate steps were taken to address the vulnerabilities identified in the previous breach.

LI.FI is a liquidity aggregation protocol that allows users to trade across various blockchains, venues, and bridges.

Reports /Trainviral/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 TechDaja News.