Connect with us
...

Politics

Talks to restore Stormont are over

Published

on

Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris has said talks aimed at restoring devolved government at Stormont are now over.

He said it was “now time for decisions” and that more than £3.3bn was available for the return of the executive.

He was speaking after financial talks and separate negotiations with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) over the Windsor Framework.

The tánaiste said the DUP’s Stormont boycott was a “denial of democracy”.

Micheál Martin, the Irish deputy prime minister, added that the stance of DUP leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson’s party was “disappointing”.

The Irish government is due to meet Mr Heaton-Harris this week, Mr Martin said.

Micháel Martin
Micheál Martin says the last Northern Ireland election results should be honoured

Mr Heaton Harris said it was the final offer, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle.

The talks have been taking place in a background of rising hospital waiting lists and ongoing strikes by public transport workers, teachers and NHS staff.

‘Disappointing’

Mr Heaton-Harris said the financial package includes £584m to address public sector pay issues and “reasonably and generously” responds to the Northern Ireland parties’ concerns.

“It is disappointing that there will not be a new executive up and running to take up this offer and deliver it for the people of Northern Ireland before Christmas,” he told reporters.

“However, this package is on the table and will remain there, available on day one of an incoming Northern Ireland Executive to take up.”

He said by raising the offer of additional cash he was “not trying to put undue pressure on anyone or any party in any way”.

Mr Heaton-Harris said there was “no deadline” regarding the deal and that he would be in NI over Christmas if parties wished to speak to him.

Northern Ireland’s largest unionist party has been boycotting devolved government at Stormont for 22 months, in protest against post-Brexit trade arrangements..

Sir Jeffrey Donaldson said there was still not a “basis to deliver the financial stability Northern Ireland needs”.

He said he was “very clear” there was no agreement with the government over the post-Brexit deal known as the Windsor Framework.

Despite Mr Heaton-Harris saying the talks were over, Sir Jeffrey said he had not been told this.

What’s the political reaction been?

Mary-Lou McDonald
Mary-Lou McDonald said the decision has to be taken to bring the Assembly back

Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald said it was “very regrettable” that no decision has been made by the DUP to restore Stormont and the public will be “bitterly disappointed”.

“The work is done. The decision has to be taken to recall the Assembly,” she added.

Naomi Long
Naomi Long said the ball was firmly in the DUP’s court

Alliance Party leader Naomi Long said the meeting with Mr Heaton-Harris on Tuesday morning was “useful” and that the new financial package was “much better”.

Mrs Long added that now that the Northern Ireland secretary said the Windsor Framework talks had concluded, the ball was “vey firmly in the DUP’s court”.

Ulster Unionist Party leader Doug Beattie along with Steve Aiken and Robbie Butler
Doug Beattie says the offer is a good financial package

Ulster Unionist Party leader Doug Beattie said the £3.3bn offer from the government was a “good financial package” and now it was “up to the DUP to make a decision”.

Mr Beattie added that pay deals for public sector workers “should be taken out of this process” and delivered before Christmas.

SDLP leader Colum Eastwood said that now is the time for parties to close a deal to restore devolution to deal with issues including public sector pay and public services.

He said people are “worried about their wages, they’re worried about family members still waiting for hospital treatment and they’re worried about the collapse of public services that we all rely on”.

Micheál Martin, who is also Irish Minister of Foreign Affairs, said it was a “denial of democracy” because it has been “18 months now since the election” and that it has become difficult financially for the civil service to manage in areas like health and education.

“It’s very serious, and whether it actually does come around in the first or second week in January remains to be seen,” he added.

Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) leader Jim Allister has called on the details of the deal between the DUP and the government on the Windsor Framework to be published.

Analysis: ‘Lights on at Stormont but nobody home’

To end or not to end; that’s really the question we’re left asking now.

The government, Sinn Féin and other parties say talks are over and that it’s solely over to the DUP now.

The DUP maintains it’s not ready to finish talking yet though it’s obvious the substantive negotiations are at an end.

It was clear from Sir Jeffrey Donaldson’s press conference that he wasn’t happy with the secretary of state’s declaration at the podium.

The government has upped the ante by improving its financial offer though with no deadline things are set to drift into the new year.

The year 2023 will end as it began with the lights on at Stormont but nobody home.

Remember, 18 January is the date by which the government is obliged to call another election if things aren’t sorted by then.

Chris Heaton-Harris’s New Year’s resolution will surely be to avoid that.

But will it match the DUP’s?

What are business leaders saying?

A consortium of business organisations has expressed support for the political parties’ demand that a new funding arrangement for Stormont should be backdated.

The government has offered to implement a new “fiscal floor” from 2024 which would guarantee funding per head would be set at 124% of the level in England.

The Northern Ireland Business Alliance has told the government that should be backdated to the start of the current spending review period which began in 2021.

It is also calling for a “short, sharp independent of review public spending”.

The alliance includes the Northern Ireland Chamber, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and the Institute of Directors.

What has the DUP asked for?

Sir Jeffrey Donaldson
The DUP said the Windsor Framework did not go far enough and has been in closed talks with the government for months

The DUP pulled its first minister out of Stormont’s power-sharing executive in February 2022 in protest over the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The protocol was introduced post-Brexit to prevent the need for goods checks along the border between Northern Ireland and Republic of Ireland, which is an EU member state.

Earlier this year, the trade rules contained in the protocol were eased by the Windsor Framework – a new deal negotiated by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak with the EU.

The DUP said it did not go far enough and has been in closed talks with the government for months over further changes it wants to the framework.

The party believes the current rules, which include additional checks on goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland, are damaging to the economy and undermine Northern Ireland’s place in the UK.

Sir Jeffrey has also asked for new legislation to “safeguard and protect Northern Ireland’s ability to trade within the United Kingdom”.

Last week, Mr Sunak said the government stood ready to legislate to “protect” Northern Ireland’s place in the UK internal market.

What about Stormont’s overspend?

a mix of notes

Stormont’s overspend will be written off if devolution returns and the executive produces a fiscal sustainability plan.

The overspend over the past two financial years has amounted to almost £560m.

Repayment will initially be deferred for two years to give an executive time to prepare a plan.

It is part of the £3.3bn “final offer” from the government.

The package also includes £584m to settle public sector pay claims, £34m for tackling hospital waiting lists and £15m to help the Police Service of Northern Ireland with the impact of a major data breach.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Gething downfall delivers Starmer 1st headache

Published

on

By

Just when you’d have been forgiven for thinking politics might quieten down a bit…

The Welsh Labour government was for so long a case study in how the party could operate in power during its long years of opposition at Westminster.

And yet here we are less than a fortnight into a UK Labour government, and the Welsh Labour government is imploding.

So much for all that talk about bringing stability back to politics.

Last week Vaughan Gething was sharing smiles here not just with the new prime minister but the King too.

Now, he’s a goner, delivering Sir Keir Starmer a headache rather than a handshake.

When I was here in March covering Mr Gething’s victory, the seeds of his political demise were germinating before our eyes.

The donations row had already sprouted and his defeated opponent, Jeremy Miles, legged it from the venue without so much as any warm words about the victor on camera.

It was another sign of the cultivating anger, the political knotweed that would soon flourish and ensnare Vaughan Gething.

Along came the row about alleged leaking, a sacking, a confidence vote — and a first minister whose tenure up until today at least amounts to 2.4 times that of Liz Truss. Ouch.

Westminster has generated its fair share of turbulence in the last decade.

But it is far from unique as a source of turbulence in UK politics.

In February, Michelle O’Neill became first minister of Northern Ireland with Emma Little-Pengelly her deputy, after a long period without devolved government at Stormont.

In March, we had a new first minister of Wales, when Mark Drakeford stood down and Vaughan Gething took the job.

In April we had the resignation of the first minister of Scotland Humza Yousaf.

He was replaced the following month by John Swinney. June was the quiet month then. Just the small matter of a general election campaign.

And here we are in July, and Mr Gething is resigning.

So will begin another leadership race, a new government in Wales, a new first minister and a new team of senior Welsh ministers.

There will also be more arguments about Welsh Labour – its direction, its priorities, its capacity to govern effectively and its relationship with the UK party.

If you’re watching this in Downing Street, it’s the last thing you need.

Reports /Trainviral/

Continue Reading

Politics

Shoplifting crackdown expected to be unveiled

Published

on

By

A crackdown on shoplifting is expected to be announced in the King’s Speech on Wednesday.

The government is due to unveil a new crime bill to target people who steal goods worth less than £200.

The policy would be a reversal of 2014 legislation that meant “low-value” thefts worth under £200 were subject to less serious punishment.

The government is also expected to introduce a specific offence of assaulting a shop worker to its legislative agenda.

It will not be clear until legislation passes through Parliament what the punishments for any new or strengthened offences would be.

Data from the Office for National Statistics shows that last year was the worst on record for shoplifting in England and Wales.

Police recorded over 430,000 offences in those nations in 2023 – though retailers say underreporting means these figures are likely to represent only a fraction of the true number of incidents.

Michelle Whitehead, who works at a convenience store in Wolverhampton, said her shop had been “hit every day” by thieves.

People were stealing “absolutely anything” including “tins of spam, tins of corned beef, all the fresh meat”, Ms Whitehead told BBC Radio 4’s World at One programme.

“They’re just coming in, getting their whole arm and sweeping the lot off the shelves,” she said. “The shelves were always empty.”

She said she believed “organised” criminal gangs, rather than individuals struggling with the cost of living, were behind the thefts in her shop.

The crackdown on “low-value” shoplifting “will help a lot of little shops,” Ms Whitehead said.

While retailers and shop workers have welcomed the anticipated proposals, a civil liberties group has raised concerns about criminalising people struggling to make ends meet and overburdening the prison system.

The new legal measures are expected to be announced as part of the King’s Speech on Wednesday, a key piece of the State Opening of Parliament that allows the government to outline its priorities over the coming months.

Before the general election, the Labour Party pledged to reverse what it described as the “shoplifter’s charter” – a piece of 2014 legislation that reduced the criminal punishment for “low-value shoplifting”.

Tom Holder, spokesperson for the British Retail Consortium (BRC), told BBC News the impact of the 2014 legislation has been to “deprioritise it in the eyes of police”.

“I think police would be less likely to turn up to what they see as low-level theft,” he said.

Shoplifting cost retailers £1.8 billion in the last year, which could impact prices, according to the BRC.

“Shoplifting harms everyone in that sense – those costs eventually get made up somewhere, whether it’s prices going up or other prices that can’t come down,” Mr Holder said.

Co-op campaigns and public affairs director Paul Gerrard said the supermarket chain had also recorded rising theft and violence against shop workers.

“There’s always been people who will steal to make ends meet. That’s not what is behind the rise we’ve seen,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Tuesday. “What’s behind that rise is individuals and gangs targeting large volumes of stock in stores for resale in illicit venues like pubs, clubs, markets, and out the back of cars.”

But Jodie Beck, policy and campaigns officer at civil liberties organisation Liberty, had concerns about the expected proposals, saying there is “already a wide range of powers” the police can use to tackle shoplifting and anti-social behaviour levelled at retail staff.

Ms Beck said the “£200 threshold” would not just target criminal gangs but also “people who are pushed into the desperate situation of not paying for things” because they cannot afford to make ends meet.

She urged the government to avoid focusing on “criminal justice and policing solutions instead of doing the thoughtful work of looking at the root causes of crime, which we believe are related to poverty and inequality”.

Ms Beck also argued the additional legislation could serve to worsen the UK’s “enormous court backlog” and its “bursting prison system”.

Last week, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced plans to release thousands of prisoners early to ease overcrowding in the country’s prisons.

A spokesperson for Downing Street said the government would not comment on the King’s Speech until it has been delivered by the monarch.

The National Police Chiefs’ Council has been approached for comment.

Reports /Trainviral/

Continue Reading

Politics

Government launches ‘root and branch’ review

Published

on

By

Defence Secretary John Healey hailed the government’s defence review as the “first of its kind” and said it will “take a fresh look at the challenges we face”.

Mr Healey noted the “increasing instability and uncertainty” around the world, including the conflict in the Middle East and war in Ukraine, and said “threats are growing”.

The strategic defence review will consider the current state of the armed forces, the threats the UK faces and the capabilities needed to address them.

Sir Keir Starmer has previously said the review will set out a “roadmap” to the goal of spending 2.5% of national income on defence – a target he has made a “cast iron” commitment to but is yet to put a timeline on.

On Monday, the prime minister said the “root and branch review” of the armed forces would help prepare the UK for “a more dangerous and volatile world”.

The review will invite submissions from the military, veterans, MPs, the defence industry, the public, academics and the UK’s allies until the end of September and aims to deliver its findings in the first half of 2025.

“I promised the British people I would deliver the change needed to take our country forward, and I promised action not words,” Sir Keir said.

“That’s why one of my first acts since taking office is to launch our strategic defence review.

“We will make sure our hollowed out armed forces are bolstered and respected, that defence spending is responsibly increased, and that our country has the capabilities needed to ensure the UK’s resilience for the long term.”

The review will be overseen by Defence Secretary John Healey and headed by former Nato Secretary General Lord Robertson along with former US presidential advisor Fiona Hill and former Joint Force Commander Gen Sir Richard Barrons.

The group will have their work cut out.

The global security threats facing the UK and its Western allies are more serious and more complex than at any time since the end of the Cold War in 1990.

They also coincide with what many commentators have said is a catastrophic running down of the UK’s armed forces to the point where the country is arguably no longer considered to be a Tier One military force.

In terms of the number of troops in its regular forces, the British Army is now at its smallest size since the time of the Napoleonic Wars two centuries ago.

Recruitment is failing to match retention, with many soldiers and officers complaining about neglected and substandard accommodation.

The Royal Navy, which has spent vast sums on its two centrepiece aircraft carriers, is in need of many more surface ships to fulfil its tasks around the globe.

Its ageing fleet of nuclear-armed Vanguard submarines, the cornerstone of the UK’s strategic defence and known as the Continuous At Sea Deterrent (CASD), is overdue for replacement by four Dreadnought class submarines and costs are mounting.

Commenting on the review, Mr Healey said: “Hollowed-out armed forces, procurement waste and neglected morale cannot continue.”

Too many UK commitments?

The defence and security threats facing the UK, Nato and its allies further afield are multiple.

They include a war raging on Europe’s eastern flank in Ukraine against Russia’s full-scale invasion. The UK, along with the EU and Nato, has opted to help defend Ukraine with multi-billion pound packages of weapons and aid, stopping short of committing combat troops.

The policy behind this is not entirely altruistic. European governments, especially those closest to Russia like Poland and the Baltic states, fear that if President Putin wins the war in Ukraine it will not be long before he rebuilds his army and invades them next.

Some of those countries are already busy beefing up their own defence spending closer to 3% or even 4% of GDP.

The challenge for Nato has been how to provide Ukraine with as much weaponry as it can, without provoking Russia into retaliating against a Nato state and risk triggering a third world war.

The Royal Navy has been in action recently in the Red Sea, where it has been operating alongside the US Navy in fending off attacks on shipping by the Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen.

But the UK has also made naval commitments further afield in the South China Sea with the Aukus pact, comprising of Australia, UK and the US, aimed at containing Chinese expansion in the region.

Critics have questioned whether a financially-constrained UK can afford to make commitments like this on the other side of the world.

Closer to home in Europe, there is a growing threat from so-called “hybrid warfare” attacks, suspected of coming from Russia.

These are anonymous, unattributable attacks on undersea pipelines and telecoms cables on which Western nations depend.

As tensions increase with Moscow there are fears such actions will only increase and the UK cannot possibly hope to guard all of its coastline all of the time.

But while those nervous Nato partners living close to Russia’s borders are busy beefing up their defence spending closer to 3 or even 4% of GDP, the UK has so far declined to put a timetable on when it will raise its own defence spending to just 2.5%.

Opposition figures have criticised the government for refusing to say when defence spending will be increased.

Before his election defeat, former prime minister Rishi Sunak committed to reaching 2.5% by 2030.

Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge previously said: “In a world that is more volatile and dangerous than at any time since the Cold War, Keir Starmer’s Labour government had a clear choice to match the Conservatives’ fully funded pledge to spend 2.5% of GDP on defence by 2030.

“By failing to do so, they’ve created huge uncertainty for our armed forces, at the worst possible time.”

Reports /Trainviral/

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 TechDaja News.